I will first review the concept of Likelihood and how we can find the value of a parameter, in this case the probability of flipping a heads, that makes observing our data the most likely. We now extend this result to a class of parametric problems in which the likelihood functions have a special . ', referring to the nuclear power plant in Ignalina, mean? For the test to have significance level \( \alpha \) we must choose \( y = b_{n, p_0}(\alpha) \). Throughout the lesson, we'll continue to assume that we know the the functional form of the probability density (or mass) function, but we don't know the value of one (or more . Sufficient Statistics and Maximum Likelihood Estimators, MLE derivation for RV that follows Binomial distribution. The likelihood ratio statistic is \[ L = \left(\frac{b_1}{b_0}\right)^n \exp\left[\left(\frac{1}{b_1} - \frac{1}{b_0}\right) Y \right] \]. The decision rule in part (a) above is uniformly most powerful for the test \(H_0: p \le p_0\) versus \(H_1: p \gt p_0\). Browse other questions tagged, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. This can be accomplished by considering some properties of the gamma distribution, of which the exponential is a special case. The sample variables might represent the lifetimes from a sample of devices of a certain type. endobj Again, the precise value of \( y \) in terms of \( l \) is not important. If we didnt know that the coins were different and we followed our procedure we might update our guess and say that since we have 9 heads out of 20 our maximum likelihood would occur when we let the probability of heads be .45. Suppose again that the probability density function \(f_\theta\) of the data variable \(\bs{X}\) depends on a parameter \(\theta\), taking values in a parameter space \(\Theta\). This is one of the cases that an exact test may be obtained and hence there is no reason to appeal to the asymptotic distribution of the LRT. {\displaystyle \lambda _{\text{LR}}} Exponential distribution - Maximum likelihood estimation - Statlect 18 0 obj << Example 6.8 Let X1;:::; . The likelihood-ratio test rejects the null hypothesis if the value of this statistic is too small. {\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}} What were the most popular text editors for MS-DOS in the 1980s? Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. Recall that the PDF \( g \) of the exponential distribution with scale parameter \( b \in (0, \infty) \) is given by \( g(x) = (1 / b) e^{-x / b} \) for \( x \in (0, \infty) \). xZ#WTvj8~xq#l/duu=Is(,Q*FD]{e84Cc(Lysw|?{joBf5VK?9mnh*N4wq/a,;D8*`2qi4qFX=kt06a!L7H{|mCp.Cx7G1DF;u"bos1:-q|kdCnRJ|y~X6b/Gr-'7b4Y?.&lG?~v.,I,-~ 1J1 -tgH*bD0whqHh[F#gUqOF RPGKB]Tv! \(H_0: X\) has probability density function \(g_0(x) = e^{-1} \frac{1}{x! However, in other cases, the tests may not be parametric, or there may not be an obvious statistic to start with. Assuming you are working with a sample of size $n$, the likelihood function given the sample $(x_1,\ldots,x_n)$ is of the form, $$L(\lambda)=\lambda^n\exp\left(-\lambda\sum_{i=1}^n x_i\right)\mathbf1_{x_1,\ldots,x_n>0}\quad,\,\lambda>0$$, The LR test criterion for testing $H_0:\lambda=\lambda_0$ against $H_1:\lambda\ne \lambda_0$ is given by, $$\Lambda(x_1,\ldots,x_n)=\frac{\sup\limits_{\lambda=\lambda_0}L(\lambda)}{\sup\limits_{\lambda}L(\lambda)}=\frac{L(\lambda_0)}{L(\hat\lambda)}$$. Why typically people don't use biases in attention mechanism? Browse other questions tagged, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. on what probability of TypeI error is considered tolerable (TypeI errors consist of the rejection of a null hypothesis that is true). So assuming the log likelihood is correct, we can take the derivative with respect to $L$ and get: $\frac{n}{x_i-L}+\lambda=0$ and solve for $L$? The graph above show that we will only see a Test Statistic of 5.3 about 2.13% of the time given that the null hypothesis is true and each coin has the same probability of landing as a heads. Now the way I approached the problem was to take the derivative of the CDF with respect to $\lambda$ to get the PDF which is: Then since we have $n$ observations where $n=10$, we have the following joint pdf, due to independence: $$(x_i-L)^ne^{-\lambda(x_i-L)n}$$ 8.2.3.3. Likelihood ratio tests - NIST Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. PDF Stat 710: Mathematical Statistics Lecture 22 s\5niW*66p0&{ByfU9lUf#:"0/hIU>>~Pmw&#d+Nnh%w5J+30\'w7XudgY;\vH`\RB1+LqMK!Q$S>D KncUeo8( PDF Lecture 15: UMP tests and unbiased tests MIP Model with relaxed integer constraints takes longer to solve than normal model, why? How to find MLE from a cumulative distribution function? This article uses the simple example of modeling the flipping of one or multiple coins to demonstrate how the Likelihood-Ratio Test can be used to compare how well two models fit a set of data. PDF Statistics 3858 : Likelihood Ratio for Exponential Distribution in a one-parameter exponential family, it is essential to know the distribution of Y(X). Finally, I will discuss how to use Wilks Theorem to assess whether a more complex model fits data significantly better than a simpler model. When the null hypothesis is true, what would be the distribution of $Y$? Lesson 27: Likelihood Ratio Tests | STAT 415 By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. Short story about swapping bodies as a job; the person who hires the main character misuses his body. Our simple hypotheses are. MathJax reference. Adding EV Charger (100A) in secondary panel (100A) fed off main (200A), Generating points along line with specifying the origin of point generation in QGIS, "Signpost" puzzle from Tatham's collection. All images used in this article were created by the author unless otherwise noted. A rejection region of the form \( L(\bs X) \le l \) is equivalent to \[\frac{2^Y}{U} \le \frac{l e^n}{2^n}\] Taking the natural logarithm, this is equivalent to \( \ln(2) Y - \ln(U) \le d \) where \( d = n + \ln(l) - n \ln(2) \). Now lets do the same experiment flipping a new coin, a penny for example, again with an unknown probability of landing on heads. In the previous sections, we developed tests for parameters based on natural test statistics. {\displaystyle \lambda } Restating our earlier observation, note that small values of \(L\) are evidence in favor of \(H_1\). 0 All you have to do then is plug in the estimate and the value in the ratio to obtain, $$L = \frac{ \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^n \exp\left\{ -\frac{n}{2} \bar{X} \right\} } { \left( \frac{1}{ \bar{X} } \right)^n \exp \left\{ -n \right\} } $$, and we reject the null hypothesis of $\lambda = \frac{1}{2}$ when $L$ assumes a low value, i.e. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. approaches Below is a graph of the chi-square distribution at different degrees of freedom (values of k). Moreover, we do not yet know if the tests constructed so far are the best, in the sense of maximizing the power for the set of alternatives. Why typically people don't use biases in attention mechanism? On the other hand the set $\Omega$ is defined as, $$\Omega = \left\{\lambda: \lambda >0 \right\}$$. Reject \(H_0: b = b_0\) versus \(H_1: b = b_1\) if and only if \(Y \ge \gamma_{n, b_0}(1 - \alpha)\). I will then show how adding independent parameters expands our parameter space and how under certain circumstance a simpler model may constitute a subspace of a more complex model. >> This asymptotically distributed as x O Tris distributed as X OT, is asymptotically distributed as X Submit You have used 0 of 4 attempts Save Likelihood Ratio Test for Shifted Exponential II 1 point possible (graded) In this problem, we assume that = 1 and is known. Likelihood Ratio Test for Shifted Exponential 2 points possible (graded) While we cannot formally take the log of zero, it makes sense to define the log-likelihood of a shifted exponential to be {(1,0) = (n in d - 1 (X: a) Luin (X. Why is it true that the Likelihood-Ratio Test Statistic is chi-square distributed? : In this case, under either hypothesis, the distribution of the data is fully specified: there are no unknown parameters to estimate. In this case, \( S = R^n \) and the probability density function \( f \) of \( \bs X \) has the form \[ f(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n) = g(x_1) g(x_2) \cdots g(x_n), \quad (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n) \in S \] where \( g \) is the probability density function of \( X \). A generic term of the sequence has probability density function where: is the support of the distribution; the rate parameter is the parameter that needs to be estimated. Extracting arguments from a list of function calls, Generic Doubly-Linked-Lists C implementation. Consider the hypotheses H: X=1 VS H:+1. statistics - Likelihood ratio of exponential distribution - Mathematics The blood test result is positive, with a likelihood ratio of 6. Thanks. {\displaystyle \Theta _{0}} Part2: The question also asks for the ML Estimate of $L$. \( H_0: X \) has probability density function \(g_0 \). To find the value of , the probability of flipping a heads, we can calculate the likelihood of observing this data given a particular value of . Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. O Tris distributed as N (0,1). Likelihood functions, similar to those used in maximum likelihood estimation, will play a key role. /Resources 1 0 R endstream Maximum Likelihood for the Exponential Distribution, Clearly - YouTube Intuitively, you might guess that since we have 7 heads and 3 tails our best guess for is 7/10=.7. Step 2. The exponential distribution is a special case of the Weibull, with the shape parameter \(\gamma\) set to 1. How can I control PNP and NPN transistors together from one pin? In the graph above, quarter_ and penny_ are equal along the diagonal so we can say the the one parameter model constitutes a subspace of our two parameter model. We can use the chi-square CDF to see that given that the null hypothesis is true there is a 2.132276 percent chance of observing a Likelihood-Ratio Statistic at that value. Suppose that b1 < b0. The likelihood ratio is the test of the null hypothesis against the alternative hypothesis with test statistic L ( 1) / L ( 0) I get as far as 2 log ( LR) = 2 { ( ^) ( ) } but get stuck on which values to substitute and getting the arithmetic right. Find the MLE of $L$. Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. \end{align*}$$, Please note that the $mean$ of these numbers is: $72.182$. We have the CDF of an exponential distribution that is shifted $L$ units where $L>0$ and $x>=L$. The MLE of $\lambda$ is $\hat{\lambda} = 1/\bar{x}$. {\displaystyle \Theta } The most important special case occurs when \((X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_n)\) are independent and identically distributed. {\displaystyle H_{0}\,:\,\theta \in \Theta _{0}} So everything we observed in the sample should be greater of $L$, which gives as an upper bound (constraint) for $L$. I formatted your mathematics (but did not fix the errors). So returning to example of the quarter and the penny, we are now able to quantify exactly much better a fit the two parameter model is than the one parameter model. The numerator of this ratio is less than the denominator; so, the likelihood ratio is between 0 and 1. /Type /Page Consider the hypotheses \(\theta \in \Theta_0\) versus \(\theta \notin \Theta_0\), where \(\Theta_0 \subseteq \Theta\). We can then try to model this sequence of flips using two parameters, one for each coin. Reject H0: b = b0 versus H1: b = b1 if and only if Y n, b0(1 ). The above graphs show that the value of the test statistic is chi-square distributed. \(H_1: \bs{X}\) has probability density function \(f_1\). Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, and our products. >> endobj Math Statistics and Probability Statistics and Probability questions and answers Likelihood Ratio Test for Shifted Exponential II 1 point possible (graded) In this problem, we assume that = 1 and is known. Lesson 27: Likelihood Ratio Tests - PennState: Statistics Online Courses This fact, together with the monotonicity of the power function can be used to shows that the tests are uniformly most powerful for the usual one-sided tests. Put mathematically we express the likelihood of observing our data d given as: L(d|). If the constraint (i.e., the null hypothesis) is supported by the observed data, the two likelihoods should not differ by more than sampling error. Likelihood ratio test for $H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2 = 0$ for 2 samples with common but unknown variance. For the test to have significance level \( \alpha \) we must choose \( y = \gamma_{n, b_0}(1 - \alpha) \), If \( b_1 \lt b_0 \) then \( 1/b_1 \gt 1/b_0 \). I do! This paper proposes an overlapping-based test statistic for testing the equality of two exponential distributions with different scale and location parameters. What is the likelihood-ratio test statistic Tr? Alternatively one can solve the equivalent exercise for U ( 0, ) distribution since the shifted exponential distribution in this question can be transformed to U ( 0, ). The Neyman-Pearson lemma is more useful than might be first apparent. This is a past exam paper question from an undergraduate course I'm hoping to take. )>e +(-00) 1min (x)9mf f{9 Yy| Pd}KtF_&vL.nH*0eswn{;;v=!Kg! When a gnoll vampire assumes its hyena form, do its HP change? I fully understand the first part, but in the original question for the MLE, it wants the MLE Estimate of $L$ not $\lambda$. Suppose that \(\bs{X} = (X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_n)\) is a random sample of size \( n \in \N_+ \), either from the Poisson distribution with parameter 1 or from the geometric distribution on \(\N\) with parameter \(p = \frac{1}{2}\). {\displaystyle \chi ^{2}} Now we write a function to find the likelihood ratio: And then finally we can put it all together by writing a function which returns the Likelihood-Ratio Test Statistic based on a set of data (which we call flips in the function below) and the number of parameters in two different models. Understanding the probability of measurement w.r.t. Finding maximum likelihood estimator of two unknowns. Doing so gives us log(ML_alternative)log(ML_null). Is this the correct approach? This is clearly a function of $\frac{\bar{X}}{2}$ and indeed it is easy to show that that the null hypothesis is then rejected for small or large values of $\frac{\bar{X}}{2}$. H We reviewed their content and use your feedback to keep the quality high. Do you see why the likelihood ratio you found is not correct? Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, and our products. Then there might be no advantage to adding a second parameter. the MLE $\hat{L}$ of $L$ is $$\hat{L}=X_{(1)}$$ where $X_{(1)}$ denotes the minimum value of the sample (7.11). are usually chosen to obtain a specified significance level {\displaystyle \ell (\theta _{0})} )>e +(-00) 1min (x)+(-00) 1min: (X:)1. 3 0 obj << Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. statistics - Shifted Exponential Distribution and MLE - Mathematics 0. Solved Likelihood Ratio Test for Shifted Exponential II 1 - Chegg Monotone Likelihood Ratios Definition Hall, 1979, and . we want squared normal variables. j4sn0xGM_vot2)=]}t|#5|8S?eS-_uHP]I"%!H=1GRD|3-P\ PO\8[asl e/0ih! Intuition for why $X_{(1)}$ is a minimal sufficient statistic. Is "I didn't think it was serious" usually a good defence against "duty to rescue"? where t is the t-statistic with n1 degrees of freedom. It's not them. Lecture 22: Monotone likelihood ratio and UMP tests Monotone likelihood ratio A simple hypothesis involves only one population. Understand now! From simple algebra, a rejection region of the form \( L(\bs X) \le l \) becomes a rejection region of the form \( Y \ge y \). Reject \(H_0: b = b_0\) versus \(H_1: b = b_1\) if and only if \(Y \le \gamma_{n, b_0}(\alpha)\). If \( p_1 \gt p_0 \) then \( p_0(1 - p_1) / p_1(1 - p_0) \lt 1 \). Suppose that \(\bs{X}\) has one of two possible distributions. Are there any canonical examples of the Prime Directive being broken that aren't shown on screen? The likelihood ratio statistic is L = (b1 b0)n exp[( 1 b1 1 b0)Y] Proof The following tests are most powerful test at the level Suppose that b1 > b0. By clicking Post Your Answer, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. What does 'They're at four. The Likelihood-Ratio Test. An intuitive explanation of the | by Clarke /Length 2068 The following tests are most powerful test at the \(\alpha\) level. {\displaystyle \theta } )G L The likelihood ratio test is one of the commonly used procedures for hypothesis testing. LR+ = probability of an individual without the condition having a positive test. , and notation refers to the supremum. And if I were to be given values of $n$ and $\lambda_0$ (e.g. Probability, Mathematical Statistics, and Stochastic Processes (Siegrist), { "9.01:_Introduction_to_Hypothesis_Testing" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "9.02:_Tests_in_the_Normal_Model" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "9.03:_Tests_in_the_Bernoulli_Model" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "9.04:_Tests_in_the_Two-Sample_Normal_Model" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "9.05:_Likelihood_Ratio_Tests" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "9.06:_Chi-Square_Tests" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, { "00:_Front_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "01:_Foundations" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "02:_Probability_Spaces" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "03:_Distributions" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "04:_Expected_Value" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "05:_Special_Distributions" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "06:_Random_Samples" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "07:_Point_Estimation" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "08:_Set_Estimation" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "09:_Hypothesis_Testing" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10:_Geometric_Models" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "11:_Bernoulli_Trials" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12:_Finite_Sampling_Models" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "13:_Games_of_Chance" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "14:_The_Poisson_Process" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "15:_Renewal_Processes" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16:_Markov_Processes" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "17:_Martingales" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "18:_Brownian_Motion" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "zz:_Back_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, [ "article:topic", "license:ccby", "authorname:ksiegrist", "likelihood ratio", "licenseversion:20", "source@http://www.randomservices.org/random" ], https://stats.libretexts.org/@app/auth/3/login?returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fstats.libretexts.org%2FBookshelves%2FProbability_Theory%2FProbability_Mathematical_Statistics_and_Stochastic_Processes_(Siegrist)%2F09%253A_Hypothesis_Testing%2F9.05%253A_Likelihood_Ratio_Tests, \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\), \(\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}}\) \(\newcommand{\N}{\mathbb{N}}\) \(\newcommand{\Z}{\mathbb{Z}}\) \(\newcommand{\P}{\mathbb{P}}\) \(\newcommand{\E}{\mathbb{E}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{var}}\) \(\newcommand{\sd}{\text{sd}}\) \(\newcommand{\bs}{\boldsymbol}\), 9.4: Tests in the Two-Sample Normal Model, source@http://www.randomservices.org/random. /Font << /F15 4 0 R /F8 5 0 R /F14 6 0 R /F25 7 0 R /F11 8 0 R /F7 9 0 R /F29 10 0 R /F10 11 0 R /F13 12 0 R /F6 13 0 R /F9 14 0 R >> For=:05 we obtainc= 3:84. {\displaystyle \Theta } In the basic statistical model, we have an observable random variable \(\bs{X}\) taking values in a set \(S\). ) Lets also define a null and alternative hypothesis for our example of flipping a quarter and then a penny: Null Hypothesis: Probability of Heads Quarter = Probability Heads Penny, Alternative Hypothesis: Probability of Heads Quarter != Probability Heads Penny, The Likelihood Ratio of the ML of the two parameter model to the ML of the one parameter model is: LR = 14.15558, Based on this number, we might think the complex model is better and we should reject our null hypothesis. Generating points along line with specifying the origin of point generation in QGIS. Since P has monotone likelihood ratio in Y(X) and y is nondecreasing in Y, b a. . We can use the chi-square CDF to see that given that the null hypothesis is true there is a 2.132276 percent chance of observing a Likelihood-Ratio Statistic at that value.